Airline held liable when its website chatbot gave wrong bereavement-fare advice (Moffatt v. Air Canada, 2024)
A customer relied on Air Canada's website chatbot, which told him he could apply for a bereavement fare retroactively; the airline's policy did not allow that.
What happened
- Air Canada argued it could not be held liable for information provided by its chatbot.Moffatt v. Air Canada, 2024 BCCRT 149
- The tribunal largely allowed the customer's claim and ordered Air Canada to pay a total of $812 CAD.Moffatt v. Air Canada, 2024 BCCRT 149
The failure pattern
Watch the pattern: AI action exceeds its intended scope
Safeguards that address it
CollectSEA's engineering analysis of what would have prevented or contained this failure.
- Ground policy answers in the authoritative policy sourceAnswer refund and eligibility questions from current policy text and link to it instead of free-form generation.
- Treat chatbot statements as company statementsConstrain what the assistant may promise, add disclaimers that cannot substitute for accuracy, and review high-stakes answers.
Related standards
CollectSEA's mapping through this incident's failure pattern; not an official determination by the standards bodies.
- ASI02 Tool Misuse and Exploitation
- ASI03 Identity and Privilege Abuse
- ASI09 Human-Agent Trust Exploitation
- ASI10 Rogue Agents
- LLM03 Excessive Agency
- LLM07 Misinformation
- LLM10 Improper Output Handling
- AC-3 Access Enforcement
- AC-5 Separation of Duties
- AC-6 Least Privilege
- SI-10 Information Input Validation
- RV.3.4 Update the development process
- MAP 5.1 Estimate impacts from past uses and public incident reports
- CWE-862 Missing Authorization
- CWE-250 Execution with Unnecessary Privileges
Building something similar?
Describe your design and see every precedent that applies, with safeguards you can hand to your coding agent.
Incidents with the same pattern
AI coding agent deletes a live production database during a code freeze (Replit, 2025)
An AI coding agent deleted a live production database that held data on more than 1,200 executives and over 1,190 companies.
Security issue reported in Software component
The WSP MCP AI Agents Connector plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Sensitive Information Disclosure in versions up to, and including, 2.9.5.
Software component issue could run attacker-controlled scripts in a browser
Wheels CLI 4.0.0 through 4.1.1 insufficiently validates or escapes caller-supplied values and package contents. Deploy release/version/rollback values can execute shell commands on deploy hosts as the SSH user and on the…
Security issue reported in @aborruso/ckan-mcp-server
The MCP Apps UI resource (an interactive DataStore table rendered in the host's webview/iframe) communicates with its parent via postMessage.
Security issue reported in Software component
undici is an HTTP client library for Node.js. In versions 4.0.0 through 6.29.0, 7.0.0 through 7.30.0, and 8.0.0 through 8.12.1, its Agent dispatcher passes its constructor options through a JSON-based deep clone before…
Security issue reported in Software component
undici is an HTTP client library for Node.js. In versions 7.0.0 through 7.30.0 and 8.0.0 through 8.12.1, when an originless Agent composes the redirect and cache interceptors in that order with a shared cache store, the…